The Holy Quran was revealed in Arabic to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) over 1400 years ago. Many English Quran Translation exist, seeking to convey the meaning and message of the divine text. But which comes closest to mirroring the words and style of the original Arabic?
The Complexity of Quranic Arabic
Classical Quranic Arabic, known as fus’ha, has unique qualities that make translating it exceptionally difficult:
- Extremely eloquent, rhythmic, and poetic.
- Rich vocabulary with words having multiple shades of meaning.
- Complex grammar and sentence structure.
- Literary devices like metaphors and rhetorical questions.
Add to this the sacredness and inimitability of Allah’s direct words, and the translator’s task becomes tremendously challenging.
Translation Methods and Goals
There are two main translation approaches, with different goals:
1. Literal Word-for-Word
Tries adhering closely to the original grammatical structure and word order, even if awkward in English.
Aim: Allow reader to analyze the Arabic through direct translation.
2. Meaning-Based
Focuses on conveying the overall meaning accurately, even if rephrasing is needed.
Aim: Smooth, easily readable English focusing on meaning.
In practice, most translators employ something between literal and meaning-based approaches. But staying close to Arabic wording versus readability in English remains a balancing act.
Criteria for Assessing Closeness to Original
Key markers of a translation that succeeds in closely mirroring the Quran’s Arabic:
- Adheres as much as possible to the original word order and sentence structure.
- Preserves Arabic grammar features absent in English like dual forms.
- Minimal paraphrasing – sticks close to the original phrasing.
- Retains repetition of words and phrases rather than compressing.
- Uses parentheses to insert implied words for clarity as needed.
- Adds footnotes to explain translation decisions and convey multiple meanings.
However, being extremely literal can make the English awkward, unclear or incorrect. The best balance must be struck.
Most Respected ‘Literal’ Translations
Here are some of the most widely accepted English translations that prioritize close adherence to the Arabic words and grammar:
1. Saheeh International
- Stays very close to Arabic sentence structure and phrasing.
- Use of parentheses and brackets to add implied words.
- Clear modern English, easier read than extremely literal translations.
2. Muhsin Khan
- Very literal word-for-word translation.
- Preserves repetitive expressions.
- Parenthetical additions and footnotes explain translation decisions.
3. Pickthall
- Early translation (1930) but still quite literal.
- Mimics Arabic sentence structure.
- Retains archaic expressions, can be difficult read.
4. Yusuf Ali
- Relatively literal, with King James Bible-style language.
- Footnotes provide multiple alternative translations of phrases.
Most Respected ‘Meaning-Based’ Translations
These respected translations focus primarily on conveying the meaning accurately in very readable English:
1. Sahih International
- Considered one of the most authentic overall translations.
- Flowing modern English, very clear and understandable.
2. Clear Quran
- English interpretation of Quranic meanings.
- Simplified wording and sentence structure.
- Focuses on easy comprehension.
3. The Study Quran
- Very thorough explanatory translation.
- Detailed footnotes and commentary for clarity.
- But highly readable English.
Limits of Pursuing a Purely Literal Translation
While word-for-word translation seems desirable, an extremely literal rendering into English can have drawbacks:
- Unnatural and awkward phrasing.
- Confusing grammar.
- Loss of eloquence and rhetorical power of original Arabic.
- Meaning obscured for the reader instead of clarified.
Skilled translators recognize where to adhere closely to wording and where paraphrasing or restructuring is needed to convey the true meaning accurately.
Absolute literalness does not guarantee increased closeness to the original if it comes at the expense of clear communication of the message and elegance.
Should Only ‘Literal’ Translations Be Read?
Some Muslims feel only the most literal translations should be relied upon for understanding the Quran. But meaning-based translations offer benefits:
- Easier to understand and apply for non-Arabic speakers.
- Enhanced readability allows fuller comprehension of key themes.
- Meaning is conveyed even if some original expression is lost.
Rather than limiting to one style, benefiting from multiple authentic translations is recommended. Each has strengths that deepen insight.
Nuance and Mastery of Arabic Remain Essential
While useful, English translations inevitably fall short in conveying layers of meaning within Allah’s words. True mastery can only come through learning Arabic.
Key opportunities missed without Arabic knowledge:
- Appreciating linguistic perfection, eloquence and beauty of Quranic style.
- Understanding cultural references and original context.
- Grasping multiple potential meanings of vocabulary.
- Linking intra-Quranic connections and textual symmetry.
Thus, while high-quality translations should be praised, they should not make us complacent regarding the priority of gaining expertise in the Quran’s revealed Arabic language. This remains the path to profound understanding.
Conclusion – Balance of Meaning and Word Adherence
The ideal Quran translation maintains balance – not so literal that it distorts meaning, not so focused on the interpretation that it strays far from the sacred text.
Authentic translations that succeed with such balance allow deeper reflection for non-Arabic speakers, though still falling short of the original. Arabic mastery provides the ultimate door to fully unlocking the endless treasures within Allah’s words.
Read about more Qiraat Quran
